Lọc theo danh mục
  • Năm xuất bản
    Xem thêm
  • Lĩnh vực
liên kết website
Lượt truy cập
 Lượt truy cập :  24,074,818
  • Công bố khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam

Nguyen Van Phuc, Nguyen Hoc Thang, Nguyễn Học Thắng(1)

EVALUATION ON ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF GEOPOLYMERS F-ROM BOTTOM ASH AND RICE HUSK ASH

Tạp chí Khoa học Công nghệ và Thực phẩm

2017

1

Geopolymerization is the process of reactions among alumino-silicate resources in high alkaline conditions developed by Joseph Davidovits in 1970s. The reactions form chains and rings of alumino-silicate networks in geopolymeric structures. The raw materials used for geopolymerization normally contain high SiO2 and Al2O3 in the chemical compositions such as meta-kaoline, rice husk ash, fly ash, bottom ash, blast furnace slag, red mud, and others. The geopolymer-based material has potentials to replace Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)-based materials in the future because of its lower energy consumption, minimal CO2 emissions and lower production cost as it utilizes industrial waste resources. Moreover, in this paper, coal bottom ash (CBA) and rice husk ash (RHA), which are industrial and agricultural wastes, were used as raw materials with high alumino-silicate resources. Both CBA and RHA were mixed with sodium silicate (water glass) solution for 20 minutes to form geopolymer materials. The specimens were molded in 5-cm cube molds according to ASTM C109/C109M 99, and then cured at room temperature. These products were then tested for engineering properties such as compressive strength (MPa) and volumetric weight (kg/m3), and water absorption (kg/m3). The results indicated that the material can be considered lightweight with volumetric weight f-rom 1394 kg/m3 to 1655 kg/m3; compressive strength at 28 days is in the range of 2.38 MPa to 17.41 MPa; and water absorption is at 259.94 kg/m3 Keywords Coal bottom ash, geopolymers, rice husk ash, industrial waste, engineering properties.

  • [1] (2000), Standard specification for loadbearing concrete masonry units,American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia June 2000. Sec.4, Vol. 04.05.
  • [2] (2000), Standard specification for concrete brick,American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia June 2000, Sec.4, Vol. 04.05.
  • [3] Nguyen H. T., Do Q. M., Do M. H., Dinh T. K. A., Hinode H., Pham T. K., Promentilla M. A. B. (2013), Producing heat resistant geopolymer-based materials f-rom red mud and rice husk ash,11th International Conference on Ecomaterials (ICEM 11) - Green materials and green technology for green “MONOZUKURI” (Fabrication with heat), Hanoi, November 2013, W08, 82 – 87.
  • [4] Nguyen H. T., Promentilla M. A. B., Gallardo S. M., Bacani F. T., Hinode H., Do Q. M., Do M. H. and Pham T. K. - (2013), Producing geopolymer-based materials f-rom a ternary blend of red mud, rice husk ash and diatomaceous earth,20th Regional Symposium on Chemical Engineering (RSCE 2013) - Emerging Challenges in Chemical Engineering Research, Education and Industries, Bohol, November 2013, G6.
  • [5] (2000), Standard test methods for sampling and testing concrete masonry units and related units,American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia June 2000. Sec.4, Vol. 04.05.
  • [6] ASTM C109/109M (2000), Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens),American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia June 2000. Sec.4, Vol. 04.01
  • [7] Khale D. and Chaudhary R. (2007), Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review,Journal of Materials Science 42 (2007) 729-746.
  • [8] Kapur P. C. (1980), Thermal insulations f-rom rice husk ash, an agricultural waste,Ceramurgia International 6 (2) (1980) 75-78.
  • [9] Siddique R. and Khan M. I. (2011), Supplementary cementing materials,Engineering Materials, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 5 (2011) 231-281
  • [10] Bronzeoak Ltd. (2003), Rice husk ash market study,Limited Distribution – UK companies, ETSU U/00/00061/REP - DTI/Pub URN 03/668, 2003.
  • [11] Zemke N. and Woods E. (2009), Rice husk ash,California Polytechnic State University 2009, 1-12.
  • [12] Bassetti F., Coppolla D., and Ricci D. (2015), Fully-dry bottom ash removal system for elimination of ponds,2015 World of Coal Ash (WCA) Conference, May 5-7, 2015, in Nasvhille TN
  • [13] Kochert S., Ricci D., Sorrenti R. and Bertolino M. (2009), Transforming bottom ash into fly ash in coal fired power stations,2009 World of Coal Ash (WCA) Conference, May 4-7, 2009, in Lexington KY, USA
  • [14] Wang C., Li J., Sun X., Wang L. and Sun X. (2009), Evaluation of zeolites synthesized f-rom fly ash as potential adsorbents for wastewater containing heavy metals,Journal of Environmental Sciences 21 (2009) 127–136
  • [15] Juenger M. C. G., Winnefeld F., Provis J. L. and Ideker J.H. (2011), Advances in al-ternative cementitious binders,Cement and Concrete Research 1 (2011) 1232–1243.
  • [16] Zhang G. and He J. (2011), Geopolymerization of red mud and rice husk ash and potentials of the resulting geopolymeric products for civil infrastructure applications,Developments in Strategic Materials and Computational Design II, The American Ceramic Society (2011) 45 – 52
  • [17] Dimas D. D., Giannaopoulou I. P. and Panias D. (2009), Utilization of alumina red mud for synthesis of inorganic polymeric materials,Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review 30 (2009) 211–239
  • [18] Kumar S., Kumar R., Bandopadhyay A. and Mehrotra S. P. (2007), Novel geopolymeric building materials through synergistic utilization of industrial waste,International Conference Alkali Activated Materials - Research, Production and Utilization, Agentura Action M (2007) 429 – 446.
  • [19] Xu H. and van Deventer J. S. J. (2003), Effect of source materials on geopolymerization,Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (8) (2003) 1698–1706.
  • [20] Petermann J. C., Saeed A. and Hammons M. I. (2010), Alkali-activated geopolymers: A literature review,Air force research laboratory materials and manufacturing directorate, 2010
  • [21] Kong D. L. Y. and Sanjayan J. G. (2010), Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete,Cement and Concrete Research 40 (2010) 334–339.
  • [22] Kong D. L. Y., Sanjayan J. G. and Sagoe-Crentsil K. (2007), Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures,Cement and Concrete Research 37 (12) (2007) 1583–1589.
  • [23] Bakharev, T. (2005), Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack,Cement and Concrete Research 35 (2005) 658 – 670.
  • [24] van Deventer J. S. J., Provis J. L., and Duxson P. (2012), Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement,Minerals Engineering 29 (2012) 89–104
  • [25] Provis J. L. and van Deventer J. S. J. (2014), Alkali activated materials: State of the art report,RILEM-TC244 AAM, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, 2014.
  • [26] Shi C., Jinénez, A. F., Palomo A. (2011), New cements for the 21st century: the pursuit of an al-ternative to Portland cement,Cement and Concrete Research 41 (7) (2011) 750 – 763.
  • [27] Davidovits, J. (), Geopolymer chemistry and application,3rd edn, Institut Géopolymère, France, 2011.
  • [28] Davidovits, J. (2002), 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications.,Market trends and potential breakthroughs, Geopolymer 2002 Conference, Melbourne, Australia (2002) 1-16.
  • [29] Davidovits, J. (1994), Geopolymers: man-made rock geosynthesis and the resulting development of very early high strength cement,Journal of Materials Education 16 (2&3) (1994) 91-139.