BỘ KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ
HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ

Lọc theo danh mục
  • Năm xuất bản
    Xem thêm
  • Lĩnh vực
liên kết website
Lượt truy cập
 Lượt truy cập :  22,043,883
  • Công bố khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam

Tâm lý học chuyên ngành

Nguyễn Tuấn Anh(1)

Mối quan hệ giữa hành vi ủng hộ môi trường và cảm nhận hạnh phúc của thanh niên

The association between pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being of young people

Tâm lý học

2020

07

18 - 29

1859 - 0098

Hành vi, Ủng hộ môi trường, Cảm nhận hạnh phúc, Thanh niên

Pro-environmental behavior, Subjective well-being, Youth

Thông qua việc sử dụng hỏi với 443 thanh niên đang sinh sống, học tập và làm việc tại Hà Nội, nghiên cứu đã khảo sát thực trạng mức độ thực hiện hành vi ủng hộ môi trường và cảm nhận hạnh phúc của thanh niên cũng như phát hiện ra rằng, hành vi ủng hộ môi trường có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến cảm nhận hạnh phúc của thanh niên. Bên cạnh đó, giới tính và khu vực sinh sống được công nhận là những biến số điều tiết ảnh hưởng đến mối quan hệ này. Kết quả nghiên cứu của chúng tôi gợi ý cách thức tăng cường mức độ hạnh phúc của thanh niên thông qua việc khuyến khích thanh niên thực hiện các hành vi có ích và thân thiện với môi trường.

Using the questionnaire on 443 young people who were living, studying and working in Hanoi, the study investigated their levels of pro-environmental behaviors and subjective well-being. It was found that pro-environmental behavior had a positive effect on subjective well-being. In addition, gender and living area were the moderators in this relationship. Our research results have suggested ways to enhance the subjective well - being of young people by encouraging them to perform more pro-environmental behavior.

TTKHCNQG, CVv 211

Xem toàn văn
  • [1] Zsóka A.; Marjainé; Szerényi Z.; Széchy A.; Kocsis T. (2013), Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behaviour and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students.,Journal of Cleap Production. Vol. 48 (1). P. 126 - 138.
  • [2] Xiao J.J.; Li H. (2011), Sustainable consumption and life satisfaction.,Social Indicators Research. Vol. 104. P. 323 - 329.
  • [3] Xiao C.; McCright A. (2012), Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States.,Society and Natural Resources. 25 (11). P. 1.067 - 1.084.
  • [4] White M.P.; Alcock I.; Wheeler B.W.; Depledge M.H. (2013), Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data.,Psychological Science. Vol. 24. P. 920 - 928, 934.
  • [5] Venhoeven L.A.; Bolderdijk J.W.; Steg L. (2013), Explaining the paradox: How pro- environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being.,Sustainability. Vol. 5. P. 1.372- 1.386.
  • [6] Velarde M.D.; Fry G.; Tveit M. (2007), Health effects of viewing landscapes - Landscape types in environmental psychology.,Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Vol. 6. P. 199-212.
  • [7] Tranter B. (2011), Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia.,Environmental Politics. 20 (1). P. 78 - 96.
  • [8] Toth S.L.; Rogosch F.A.; Oshri A.; Gravener J.; Sturm R.; Morgan-Lopez A. (2013), The efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for economically disadvantaged mothers.,Development and Psychopathology. 25 (4). P. 1.065 - 1.078.
  • [9] Thorgersen J. (2004), A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior.,Journal of Environmental Psychology. Iss. 24. P. 9 3 - 103.
  • [10] Suárez-Varela M.; Guardiola J.; González-Gómez F. (2016), Do proenvironmental behaviors and awareness contribute to improve subjective wellbeing?,Applied Research in Quality of Life. 11 (2). P. 429-444.
  • [11] Stem P.C. (2000), New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.,Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 56. P. 407 - 424.
  • [12] Steg L.; Perlaviciute G.; Van Der Werff E.; Lurvink J. (2014), The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions.,Environment and Behavior. Vol. 46. P. 163 - 192.
  • [13] Son J.; Wilson J. (2012), Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic, and social well­ being.,Sociological Forum. 27 (3). P. 658 - 681.
  • [14] Snyder C.R.; Lopez S.J. (2002), Handbook of positive psychology.,
  • [15] Slovic P. (1999), Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield.,Risk Analysis. 19 (4). P. 689 - 701.
  • [16] O’Brien C. (2008), Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future.,Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. 49 (4). P. 289 - 295.
  • [17] Montada L.; Kals E. (1995), Perceived justice of ecological policy and proenviron- mental commitments.,Social Justice Research. Vol. 8. P. 305 - 327.
  • [18] McCright A.M.; Xiao C. (2014), Gender and environmental concern: insights f-rom recent work and for future research.,Society and Natural Resources. 27 (10). P. 1.109 - 1.113.
  • [19] McCright A.M. (2010), The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public.,Population and Environment. 32 (1). P. 66 - 87.
  • [20] MacKerron G.; Mourato S. (2013), Happiness is greater in natural environments.,Global Environmental Change. Vol. 23. P. 992 - 1.000.
  • [21] Keyes C.L.M. (2002), The mental health continuum: F-rom languishing to flourishing in life.,Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Vol. 43. P. 207 - 222.
  • [22] Keyes C.L.M. (1998), Social well-being.,Social Psychology Quarterly. 61 (2). P. 121 - 140. DOI: 10.2307/2787065.
  • [23] Kasser T.; Sheldon K.M (2002), What makes for a merry Christmas?.,Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 3. P. 313 - 329.
  • [24] Kals E.; L. Montada y M. Lerner (1996), Are proenvironment al commitments motivated by health concerns or bv perceived justice?,Current Societal concerns about justice.
  • [25] Kaiser F.; Schultz P.W.; Berenguer J.; Corral V.; Tankha G. (2008), Extending planned environmentalism. Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures.,European Psychologist. Vol. 13. P. 288 -297.
  • [26] Helliwell J.F. (2014), Social norms, happiness, and the environment: Closing the circle.,Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy. 10 (1). P. 78 - 84.
  • [27] Hartig T.; Evans G.W.; Jamner L.D.; Davis D.S.; Garling T. (2003), Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings.,Journal of Environmental Psychology. 23. P. 109 - 123.
  • [28] Gilligan C. (1982), In a different voice: Psychological theory) and women'S development.,
  • [29] Gifford R.; Nilsson A. (2014), Personal and social factors that influence pro- environmental concern and behaviour: A review.,International Journal of Psychology. 49 (3). P. 141 - 157. DOI: 10.1002/ijop. 12034.
  • [30] Ganglmair-Wooliscroft A.; Wooliscroft B. (2016), Ethical holiday behavior, wellbeing and orientations to happiness.,Applied Research in Quality of Life. 11 (1), P. 83 - 103.
  • [31] Diener E.; Heintzelman S.J.; Kushlev K.; Tay L.; Wirtz D.; Lutes L.D.; Oishi S. (2017), Findings all psychologists should know f-rom the new science on subjective well-being.,Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. Vol. 58. P. 87 - 104.
  • [32] Diener E.; Wirtz D.; Biswas-Diener R.; Tov W.; Kim-Prieto C.; Choi D. (2009), New measures of well-being.,
  • [33] Csikszentmihalyi M.; R.J. Sternberg (1999), Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity..,Handbook of creativity.
  • [34] Corral-Verdugo V.; Mireles-Acosta J.; Tapia-Fonllem C.; Fraijo-Sing B. (2011), Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective -wellbeing.,Human Ecology Review. 18 (2). P. 95 -104.
  • [35] Cloutier S.; Larson L.; Jambeck J. (2014), Are sustainable cities "happy” cities? Associations between sustainable development and human well-being in urban areas of the United States.,Environment, Development and Sustainability. 16 (3). P. 633 - 647.
  • [36] Clements B. (2012), The sociological and attitudinal bases of environmentally-related beliefs and behavior in Britain.,Environmental Politics. 21 (6). P. 901 - 921. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2012.724215.
  • [37] Brown K. W.; Kasser T. (2005), Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle.,Social Indicators Research. Vol. 74. P. 349 - 368.
  • [38] Trương Thị Khánh Hà (2015), Thích ứng thang đo Hạnh phúc chủ quan dành cho vị thành niên.,Tạp chí Tâm lý học. S 5. Tr. 52 - 64.