Lọc theo danh mục
liên kết website
Lượt truy cập
- Công bố khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam
NGUYEN HOANG OANH, NGUYEN HONG NGOC, hO ĐINH BAO, Nguyễn Hoàng Oanh(1)
Impact of Subsidy Schemes on the Economic Well-Being of Households in Vietnam
Journal of Economics and Development
2017
1
This paper uses the Propensity Score Matching method (PSM) to determine the criteria of eligibility for production and income subsidies and the Difference-in-Difference method (DID) to evaluate the impact of these policies on households' economic well-being in Vietnam. The empirical results indicate that though these policies have not contributed to a clear economic well-being improvement of the participating households, their impacts tend to move in a positive direction. It should be noted that though these policies do not make the income/expenditure of the participating households increase, they help increase the income component f-rom agricultural production significantly, especially for the group receiving production subsidies, and at the same time increase spending on durable goods and health care services in comparison with nonparticipating households.
- [1] Vuong Quoc Duy (2012), Impact of Different Access to Credit on Long and Short Term Livelihood Outcomes: Group-based and Individual Microcredit in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam,CAS Discussion Paper No. 86, Centre for International Management and Development Antwerp & Centre for ASEAN Studies
- [2] Venetoklis, T (2004), An Evaluation of Wage Subsidy Programs to SMEs Utilising Propensity Score Matching,VATT Research Reports, Government Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki, Finland
- [3] Tran Thi Thanh Tu, Nguyen Quoc Viet and Hoang Huu Loi (2015), Determinant of Access to Rural Credit and Its Effect on Living Standard: Case Study about Poor Households in Northwest, Vietnam,International Journal of Financial Research, 6(2), 218-230
- [4] Phan Thi Nu (2010), Assessment of the impact of credit on poverty reduction in rural Vietnam,Master thesis, Fulbright Economics Teaching Program, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City
- [5] Oi, J. C. and Haas, W (2008), Development Strategies, Welfare Regime and Poverty Reduction in China,UNRISD Project on Poverty Reduction and Policy Regimes
- [6] Nyangena, W. and Maurice, O. J. (2014), Impact of Improved Farm Technologies on Yields – The Case of Improved Maize Varieties and Inorganic Fertilizer in Kenya,Environment for Development, Discussion Paper Series, EfD DP 14-02, SIDA.
- [7] Nguyen Ngoc Son (2012), Poverty reduction policy in Vietnam: Current situation and orientation for improvement,Journal of Economics and Development, 181, 19-26
- [8] Mendola, M. (2006), Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matching analysis for rural Bangladesh,Food Policy, 32 (2007), 372-393
- [9] Kumari, L. (2013), Poverty Eradication in India: A Study of National Policies, Plans and Programs,International Refereed Research Journal, IV (2), 68-80
- [10] Ho Dinh Bao (2016), Impact of production and income subsidies on households’ welfare in Vietnam,External Economics Review, 81, 11-19
- [11] Elkins, M., Feeny, S. and Prentice, D (2015), Do Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers reduce poverty and improve well-being?,Discussion Paper No. 15/02, The University of Nottingham, February 2015.
- [12] Chow, G. C. (2006), Rural Poverty in China: Problem and Policy,CEPS Working paper, 134.
