BỘ KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ
HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ

Lọc theo danh mục
  • Năm xuất bản
    Xem thêm
  • Lĩnh vực
liên kết website
Lượt truy cập
 Lượt truy cập :  23,874,971
  • Công bố khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam

14

Khoa học giáo dục học nói chung, bao gồm cả đào tạo, sư phạm học, lý luận giáo dục,..

Bùi Thị Ngọc Linh, Khưu Thuận Vũ, Lê Thị Lành, Châu Minh Hùng, Nguyễn Phi Hùng(1)

Đánh giá năng lực người học và một số vấn đề cần lưu ý khi vận dụng tại trường đại học Quy Nhơn

Competency-based assessment and its challenges as implemented at quy nhon university

Tạp chí Khoa học - Đại học Sư phạm TP Hồ Chí Minh

2022

5

769-782

1859-3100

Năng lực, Người học, Đại học, Đánh giá

Assessment, Competency-based assessment, Quy Nhon University

Vấn đề triển khai đánh giá (ĐG) năng lực người học (NLNH) là yêu cầu cấp thiết để việc vận dụng dạy học phát triển năng lực tại Trường Đại học Quy Nhơn đạt hiệu quả hơn. Dựa trên phân tích các vấn đề lí thuyết liên quan, bài viết chỉ ra ba điểm cần lưu ý khi Trường Đại học Quy Nhơn tiếp cận cách ĐG dựa trên NLNH. Thứ nhất, cần có sự thay đổi thực chất và toàn diện trong nhận thức của giảng viên (GV) về dạy – học – ĐG theo quan điểm giáo dục mới. Thứ hai, hoạt động ĐG nhất thiết phải thống nhất và đồng bộ trong nhận thức và hành động của các lực lượng tham gia quá trình giáo dục. Cuối cùng, cần có sự hợp tác giữa các đơn vị chức năng, khoa chủ quản và GV trong việc đảm bảo chất lượng của hoạt động ĐG.

Competency-based assessment has become a crucial factor in ensuring the successful implementation of competency-based education at Quy Nhon University. By studying competency-based assessment characteristics, this paper reveals three potential challenges that leaders and lecturers in this tertiary institution would face as moving forward with this assessment approach. Firstly, implementingcompetency-based assessment means lecturers' perceptions of teaching, learning, and assessment must be aligned and compatible with this paradigm. Secondly, assessment needs to be perceived and operated consistently among stakeholders. Last but not least, the successful implementation of competency-based assessment requires collaboration between institutional leaders and lecturers to secure the quality of student assessment.

TTKHCNQG, CTv 138

Xem toàn văn
  • [1] Zieky, M., & Perie, M. (2006), A Primer on Setting Cut Scores on Tests of Educational Achievement [Excerpts f-rom Passing Scores: A manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational Tests].,Educational Testing Service.
  • [2] Wiggins, G. (2016), Seven keys to effective feedback. In M. Scherer (Ed.).,On formative assessment: Readings f-rom educational leadership (EL Essentials), 24-35. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  • [3] Webber, K. L. (2012), The use of learner-centered assessment in US colleges and universities.,Research in Higher Education, 53, 201-28
  • [4] Watson, A. (1994), Strategies for the Assessment of Competence,The Vocational Aspect of Education, 46(2), 155-165.
  • [5] Van der Vleuten, C., Sluijsmans, D., & Brinke, D. J. (2017), Competence assessment as learner support in education,In Competence-based vocational and professional education. Springer, Cham, 607-630.
  • [6] Tang, C., Lai, P., Arthur, D., & Leung, S. F. (1999), How do students prepare for traditional and portfolio assessment in a problem-based learning curriculum? In Themes and Variations in PBL: Refereed proceedings of the 1999 Bi-ennial PBL Conference, 1, ed. J. Conway and A.,Williams, 206-17). Australia: Australia Problem-Based Learning Network.
  • [7] Struyven, K., Dochy. F, & Janssens, S. (2005), Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review,Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 331-47.
  • [8] Scouller, K.M., & Prosser, M. (1994), Students’ experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations.,Studies in Higher Education, 19, 267-79
  • [9] Scouller, K. (1998), The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay.,Higher Education, 35, 453–72.
  • [10] Ramsden, P. (2004), Learning to teach in higher education,London: RoutledgeFalmer
  • [11] Rahman, A., Hanafi, N., Mukhtar, M., & Ahmad. J. (2014), Assessment practices for competencybased education and training in vocational college, Malaysia.,Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 1070-1076.
  • [12] Nicol, D. J, & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006), Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice.,Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
  • [13] Nguyen, D. C. (2008), Danh gia ket qua hoc tap trong giao duc dai hoc va dao tao nguon nhan luc [Assessment in higher education and human source training and development].,VNH3. TB14.586. Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
  • [14] (2013), Nghi quyet ve doi moi can ban, toan dien giao duc dao tao, dap ung yeu cau cong nghiep hoa, hien dai hoa trong dieu kien kinh te thi truong dinh huong xa hoi chu nghia va hoi nhap quoc te [Resolutions for comprehensive educational reform to respond to the requirements of industrialisation and modernisation processes in the context of socialist-oriented market economy and global integration].,Retrieved f-rom https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/thuong-mai/Nghi-quyet-29-NQ-TW-nam2013-doi-moi-can-ban-toan-dien-giao-duc-dao-tao-hoi-nhap-quoc-te-212441.aspx
  • [15] (), Achievement Levels,Retrieved f-rom https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ndehelp/webhelp/achievement_levels.htm
  • [16] Meyers, J. L. (2018), Scoring models in competency‐based educational assessment,The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 3(3), e01173.
  • [17] Messick, S. (1994), Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences f-rom persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.,ETS Research Report Series, 1994(2), i-28.
  • [18] (2018), Chương trinh giao duc pho thong – Chuong trinh tong the [General Education curriculum – The Curriculum Framework],issued with the Circular 32/2018/TT-BGDDT on 26th December, 2018 by Vietnamese Minister for Education and Training.
  • [19] Miller, G. E. (1990), The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.,Academic medicine, 65(9), S63-7.
  • [20] Jones, A. (1999), The place of judgement in competency-based assessment.,Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 51(1), 145-160.
  • [21] James, M. (2010), Educational assessment: overview,International Encyclopedia of Education, 3(1), 161-171.
  • [22] Harris, J., & Keller, S. (1976), Assessment Measures Needed for Competency-Based Higher Education.,Peabody Journal of Education, 53(4), 241-47
  • [23] Flores, M. A., Veiga Simao, A. M., Barros, A. & Pereira, D. (2015), Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education.,Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1523-1534.
  • [24] Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, A. C. (1997), Revision and the experience of understanding,In The experience of learning, ed. F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, and N.J. Entwistle, 145-58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  • [25] Ellis, L., Marston, C., Lightfoot, J., Sexton, J., Brynes, J., Heng-Yu, K., & Black, K. (2015), Faculty professional development in student learning assessment: The Assessment Leadership Institute.,Research & Practice in Assessment, 10.
  • [26] Davis, M. H., & Harden, R. M. (2003), Competency-based assessment: making it a reality.,Medical teacher, 25(6), 565-568
  • [27] Barber, M., & Phillips, V. (2000), Big change questions: Should large-scale assessment be used for accountability?,Journal of Educational Change, 1(3), 277-281.
  • [28] Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The exercise of control,New York: W. H. Freeman
  • [29] Bandura, A. (1994), Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.),Encyclopedia of human behavior, (4), 71-81). New York: Academic Press
  • [30] Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M (2006), The wheel of competency assessment. Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programmes.,Studies in Educational Evaluations, 32(2), 153-170
  • [31] Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993), Creating readiness for organizational change.,Human Relations, 46(6), 681-703.
  • [32] Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993), Classroom assessment techniques,San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
  • [33] Almond, R. J. (2009), Group assessment: comparing group and individual undergraduate module marks,Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 141-48