BỘ KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ
HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ

Lọc theo danh mục
  • Năm xuất bản
    Xem thêm
  • Lĩnh vực
liên kết website
Lượt truy cập
 Lượt truy cập :  22,778,205
  • Công bố khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam

Khoa học giáo dục học nói chung, bao gồm cả đào tạo, sư phạm học, lý luận giáo dục,..

Phạm Ngọc Thạch(1)

Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến tương tác trong một khóa học tiếng Anh trực tuyến ở Việt Nam

Factors influencing interaction in an online english course in Vietnam

TC Nghiên cứu nước ngoài – Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

2020

03

149-163

2525-2445

Tiếng Anh trực tuyến, Tương tác, Tần suất truy cập

English online, Interaction, Online presence, Vietnam

Nghiên cứu này khảo sát các yếu tố ảnh hướng đến sự tương tác của người học trong một khóa học tiếng Anh trực tuyến ở một trường đại học ở Việt Nam, sử dụng phương pháp nghiên cứu kết hợp định lượng, định tính và phân tích nhân tố. Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy các yếu tố liên quan đến khóa học bao gồm nội dung và tính linh hoạt khi triển khai, trong khi các yếu tố liên quan đến người học bao gồm khả năng sử dụng interenet và quan điểm của họ về hiệu quả của học trực tuyến. Các yếu tố liên quan đến giáo viên bao gồm tính kịp thời, hiệu quả của ý kiến phản hồi và tần suất truy cập. Ngoài ra, trong bối cảnh ở Việt Nam, một số yếu tố văn hóa như sự bị động, ngại hỏi giáo viên cũng làm ảnh hưởng đến sự tương tác của người học.

This study examines the factors that influenced learners’ online interaction in an online English learning course offered at a Vietnamese university using mixed methods approach and principal component analysis. It explores which factors would have impact on learners’ interaction with the content, peers and instructors in the course as well as the level of importance for each factor. The findings of the study indicated that factors related to the online course were its content and flexible delivery while those concerning the learners were their internet self-efficacy as well as their perceived usefulness of interaction processes. The factors related to the instructors included timeliness and usefulness of feedback and their online presence. In addition, in Vietnamese context, the cultural factors such as being passive, fear of asking questions to instructors also influenced learners’ online interaction.

TTKHCNQG, CTv 183

Xem toàn văn
  • [1] Zimmerman, T. D. (2012), Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses,International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(4), 152–165.
  • [2] Zaili, N., Moi, L. Y., Yusof, N. A., Hanfi, M. N., & Suhaimi, M. H. (2019), The factors of satisfaction on e-learning usage among Universiti Malaysia Kelantan students,Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 4(11), 73-83.
  • [3] Yükselir C. (2016), English foreign language (EFL) instructors’ and teachers’ perceptions towards the integration of Internet-assisted language leaching (IALT) into EFL instruction,Journal on Efciency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 9(1), 23-30, doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2016.090104
  • [4] Yukselturk, E. (2010), An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum,Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 24–32. Retrieved f-rom http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ897999
  • [5] Wu, W.-c. V., Yen, L. L., & Marek, M. (2011), Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability,Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 118–129.
  • [6] Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007), Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation,Internet & Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25
  • [7] Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999), Factors influencing interaction in an online course,The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22–36
  • [8] Verenikina, I., Jones, P., & Delahunty, J. (2017), The guide to fostering asynchronous online discussion in higher education. Australia,Retrieved f-rom http:// www.fold.org.au/docs/TheGuide_Final.pdf
  • [9] Tuncer, C. (2009), Learning and teaching languages online: A constructivist approach,Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 60–74
  • [10] Pham, D. T. A. (2019), An investigation into students’ evaluation of and attitudes towards synchronous computer-mediated communication on language skills development in Vietnamese institutional context,VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 35(3). doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4367
  • [11] Pham, N. T. (2018), Learner-content interaction in an online English learning course at a Vietnamese university,VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(5). doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4307
  • [12] Pham, N. T. (2015), Interpersonal interaction: A case study of an online English language learning environment at a Vietnamese university,Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved f-rom http://vuir.vu.edu.au/29786
  • [13] Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009), Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques in the social and behavioral sciences,
  • [14] Sun, S. Y. H. (2011), Online language teaching: The pedagogical challenges,Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(3), 428–447
  • [15] Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008), What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction,Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202
  • [16] Shooshtari, Z. G., Jalilifar, A., & Ostadian, M. (2018), A mixed methods study of scaffolded corrective feedback and motivational scaffolding in EFL oral production accuracy and fluency,Applied Linguisics Research Journal, 2(3). 34–47.
  • [17] Raymond, C.Y., & Choon, T.T. (2017), Understanding Asian students learning styles, cultural influence and learning strategies,Journal of Education & Social Policy, 1(7), 194-210
  • [18] Park, C. N., & Son, J.-B. (2009), Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers’ perceptions and perspectives,International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80–101.
  • [19] Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011), The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development,San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  • [20] Ntourmas, A., Avouris, N., Daskalaki, S., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2018), Teaching assistants’ interventions in online courses: a comparative study of two massive open online courses,Paper presented at the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, pp 288– 293 https://doi.org/10.1145/3291533.3291563
  • [21] Murray, M., Pérez, J., Geist, D., Hedrick, A., & Steinbach, T. (2012), Student interaction with online course content: Build it and they might come,Journal of Information Technology Education, 11(2012), 125–140.
  • [22] Moore, M. G. (1989), Editorial: Three types of interaction,The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7
  • [23] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014), Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook,
  • [24] Mekheimer, M. A. (2017), Investigating EFL instructors’ attitudes towards and motivation for e-learning tools in English language learning programmes,Journal of Arabic Studies in Education & Psychology (ASEP), 90 (2), 589-608.
  • [25] Marden, P. M., & Herrington, J. (2011), Supporting interaction and collaboration in the language classroom through computer mediated communication. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia,Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved f-rom http://researchrepository. murdoch.edu.au/6974/
  • [26] Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006), Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study,Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1–14.
  • [27] Le, S. T. (2011), Teaching English in Vietnam: Improving the provision in the private sector,Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved f-rom http://library.vu.edu.au/ record=b2237480
  • [28] Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014), Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses,The Internet and Higher Education, 20(2013), 35–50.
  • [29] Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013), A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs,The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 16–39
  • [30] Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011), Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education,Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520
  • [31] Kaiser, H. (1974), An index of factorial simplicity,Psychometrika, 39, 31–36
  • [32] Jalaluddin, M. (2016), Using youtube to enhance speaking skills in ESL classroom,English for Specific Purposes World, www. esp-world.info. 17(50).
  • [33] Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J.-L., Huang, Y.- M., Hsu, G.-L., & Lin, Y.-C. (2014), Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using Webbased multimedia system,Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09588221.2014.927367
  • [34] Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008), Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation,Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111–1124.
  • [35] Grandzol, C. J., & Grandzol, J. R. (2010), Interaction in online courses: More is not always better,Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(2). Retrieved f-rom http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ ojdla/summer132/Grandzol_Grandzol132.pdf
  • [36] Gómez-Rey, P., Barbera, F., & Fernández-Navarro, F. (2017), Student voices on the roles of instructors in asynchronous learning environments in the 21st century,International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2(18), DOI: https://doi. org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2891
  • [37] Gibby, A. S. (2007), Student perceptions of interaction in an online foreign language learning environment,Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, USA. Retrieved f-rom http://repositories.lib.utexas. edu/handle/2152/3219.
  • [38] Ghadirian, H., Ayub, A. F. M., & Salehi, K. (2017), Students’ perceptions of online discussions, participation and e-moderation behaviours in peer moderated asynchronous online discussions,Technology, Pedagogy and Education, DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2017.1380695
  • [39] Garrison, D.R, & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005), Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough,The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148
  • [40] Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007), Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions,The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.
  • [41] Ernest, P., Heiser, S., & Murphy, L. (2013), Developing teacher skills to support collaborative online language learning,The Language Learning Journal, 41(1), 37–54.
  • [42] DeVellis. (2003), Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.),
  • [43] de Lima, D.P.R., Gerosa, M.A., Conte, T.U (2019), What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: the instructors’ perspective,J Internet Serv Appl 10, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174- 019-0120-0
  • [44] Dan, T.C., Mai, H.N.A., Da, T.C., Chau, P.T.H., & Hai, L.S. (2018), Some Vietnamese cultural obstacles in speaking English: A Case at Can Tho University, Vietnam,Paper presented at the International Conference of English Language Studies (ICELS) at Suranaree University of Technology (Thailand).
  • [45] Creswell, J. W. (2009), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.),
  • [46] Cox, S., Black, J., Heney, J., & Keith, M. (2015), Promoting teacher presence: strategies for effective and efficient feedback to student writing online,Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 2(4), 376-391.
  • [47] Cho, M.-H., & Tobias, S. (2016), Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement,International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2342
  • [48] Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu. C. (2014), Listening strategy use and influential factors in web‐based computer assisted language learning,Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(2013), 207–219
  • [49] Chen, W. S., & Yao, A. Y. T. (2016), An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study,Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7). 1667-1671, DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040719
  • [50] Chen, Y.-C. (2014), An empirical examination of factors affecting college students’ proactive stickiness with a web-based English learning environment,Computers in Human Behavior, 31(2014), 159–171.
  • [51] Chang, C.-S., Liu, E. Z.-F., Sung, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Chen, N.-S., & Cheng, S.-S. (2013), Effects of online college students’ internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance,Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 366–377.
  • [52] Chang, C.-K., Chen, G.-D., & Hsu, C.-K. (2011), Providing adequate interactions in online discussion forums using few teaching assistants,Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 193–202. Retrieved f-rom http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ944965
  • [53] Byrne, D. S. (2002), Interpreting quantitative data,
  • [54] Borton, L. (2000), Working in a Vietnamese voice,Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 20–29. Retrieved f-rom http://0-www.jstor.org.library. vu.edu.au/stable/4165682
  • [55] Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017), Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systemat ic literature review,Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. edurev.2017.06.001