BỘ KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ
HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ

Lọc theo danh mục
  • Năm xuất bản
    Xem thêm
  • Lĩnh vực
liên kết website
Lượt truy cập
 Lượt truy cập :  23,056,862
  • Công bố khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam

Giáo dục chuyên biệt

Nguyễn Thị Hằng, Phạm Thị Bền(1), Sharynne McLeod, Đỗ Văn Dũng

Tổng quan mô tả về thang đo tính dễ hiểu theo ngữ cảnh

Scoping review of the Intelligibility in Context Scale

Khoa học (Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội)

2021

4AB

68-81

2354-1075

Tổng quan, Mô tả, Thang đo, Tính dễ hiểu, Ngữ cảnh

Scoping review, Intelligibility in Context Scale, Vietnamese, ICS, ICS-VN

Tính dễ hiểu lời nói là mức độ hiểu thông điệp giữa người nói và người nghe. Tính dễ hiểu lời nói có vai trò quan trọng trong xác định mức độ dễ hiểu lời nói của trẻ em, trong chẩn đoán rối loạn âm lời nói, thiết lập mục tiêu, kế hoạch can thiệp và theo dõi hiệu quả trong can thiệp lời nói. Thang đo tính dễ hiểu theo ngữ cảnh (ICS) là một trong những công cụ đo lường tính dễ hiểu lời nói phổ biến và đã được dịch ra hơn 60 ngôn ngữ trên thế giới. Bài viết này trình bày nghiên cứu tổng quan mô tả từ 39 bài viết về ICS, trong đó gồm 5 bài mô tả ICS, 19 bài nghiên cứu chuẩn hoá ICS và 15 bài nghiên cứu sử dụng ICS. Dựa vào phân tích nội dung, bài viết trình bày kết quả nghiên cứu về việc xây dựng, chuyển ngữ, nghiên cứu chuẩn hoá và sử dụng ICS ở trẻ em nói tiếng Anh (5 bài mô tả và 9 nghiên cứu), 14 ngôn ngữ khác trên thế giới (21 nghiên cứu) và tiếng Việt (4 nghiên cứu). Các nghiên cứu về ICS đã thực hiện trên các khách thể nói đơn ngữ, song ngữ và đa ngữ; có và không có rối loạn âm lời nói; ở độ tuổi từ 1;2 tuổi cho tới người lớn nhưng chủ yếu là ở trẻ em trước tuổi học. Các chỉ số về giá trị điểm trung bình, độ tin cậy, độ ổn định trong, độ nhạy, đô đặc hiệu cũng như các chỉ số tâm trắc khác của ICS đã được trình bày trong các nghiên cứu chuẩn hoá về ICS. Các kết quả phân tích này là bằng chứng cho thấy ICS là một công cụ sàng lọc có độ tin cậy được sử dụng trong nghiên cứu và thực tiễn lâm sàng để đo lường độ dễ hiểu lời nói của trẻ em ở các ngôn ngữ trên thế giới, trong đó bao gồm cả trẻ em nói tiếng Việt phương ngữ bắc và nam.

Speech intelligibility describes the degree of understanding messages between speakers and listeners. Speech intelligibility plays an important role in examining children’ speech, in diagnosing speech sound disorders, in setting goals, planning intervention, and evaluating effectiveness of speech interventions. The Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) is one of the most popular speech intelligibility measurement tools and has been translated into more than 60 languages across the world. This paper presents a scoping review of 39 publications including five describing, 19 norming and validation studies and 15 studies reporting on the use of ICS. Based on content analysis, this paper describes the development and translation, norming, validation and use of the ICS with children speaking English (five descriptions and nine papers), children speaking 14 other languages across the world (21 papers), and children speaking Vietnamese in Vietnam (four papers). Participants in the ICS studies were: monolingual, bilingual and multilingual; with and without speech sound disorders; and from 1-2 years old to adults but mainly in the preschool age range. The ICS’s mean scores, internal reliability, internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity as well as other psychometric properties were reported in ICS studies. These indicators reveal evidence that ICS is a reliable scale to use in research and clinical practice to measure speech intelligibility of children speaking different languages across the world including children speaking northern and southern Vietnamese dialects.

TTKHCNQG, CVv 157

Xem toàn văn
  • [1] Hoàng Văn Quyên, Trà Thanh Tâm, Anh CP, (2014,), “Xây dựng phác đồ điều trị âm ngữ trị liệu cho trẻ bị khe hở môi, vòm miệng, và hiệu quả ứng dụng tại bệnh viện nhi đồng 1 năm 2014”,,Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Sư phạm Tp. Hồ Chí Minh, 65 pp. 75-82.
  • [2] Hoàng Văn Quyên, Trà Thanh Tâm, Nguyễn Thị Thu Hương, và cs, (2019,), “Đặc điểm âm lời nói của trẻ bị rối loạn âm lời nói đến khám tại bệnh viên Nhi đồng 1 và Trường đại học y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch từ tháng 1-6 năm 2018”.,Y học Tp. Hồ Chí Minh, 23 (4), pp. 198-202.
  • [3] Le X T T, McLeod S & Phạm B, (2021,), “Consonant accuracy and intelligibility of Southern Vietnamese children”,,Speech, Language and Hearing, Speech, Language and Hearing, Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1888195
  • [4] Glascoe FP, (2013,), “Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) response form (Vietnamese)”,,Brentwood, TN: PEDStestOnline, LLC
  • [5] Phạm B, McLeod S, Harrison LJ, (2017,), “Validation and norming of the Intelligibility in Context Scale in Northern Viet Nam”,,Clin Linguist Phon, 31 (7-9), pp. 665-681.
  • [6] McLeod S, Harrison LJ & McCormack J, (2012,), “Thang đo Tính dễ hiểu theo ngữ cảnh: Tiếng Việt,[Intelligibility in Context Scale: Vietnamese] (T. N. Ho, T. C. Nguyen, & T. B. Phạm, Trans.)”, Bathurst, NSW, Australia: C-harles Sturt University Retrieved f-rom http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics Revised November 2015.
  • [7] . Lagerberg TB, Hellström A, Lundberg E & Hartelius L, (2019,), “An investigation of the clinical use of a singleword procedure to assess intelligibility (Swedish Test of Intelligibility for Children) and an evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Intelligibility in Context Scale”.,Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(3), 668–681
  • [8] Kogovšek D & Ozbič M, (2013,), “Lestvica razumljivosti govora v vsakdanjem življenju: slovenščina”.,Komunikacija, 2(3), 28–34. https://cobiss.izum.si/scripts/cobiss?command =DISPLAY&base=OBIB&RID=9672009
  • [9] Pascoe M & McLeod S, (2016,), “Cross-cultural adaptation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for South Africa”.,Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 32(3), 327-343.
  • [10] Leon M, Washington KN, Fritz KA, Leon M, Basinger M & Crowe K, (2021), “Intelligibility in Context Scale: Sensitivity and specificity in the Jamaican context”.,Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 35(2), 154-171
  • [11] Washington KNM, McLeod S, Crowe K & Devonish H, (2017,), “Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for Jamaican Creole-Speaking Preschoolers”,,Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 26 (3), pp. 750-761
  • [12] Piazzalunga S, Salerni N, Limarzi S, Fassina S & Schindler A, (2019,), “Do you understand your child?” Reliability and validity of a parental questionnaire: The Italian Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-I)”,,Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, Manuscript in submission.
  • [13] Kok ECE & To CKS, (2019,), “Revisiting the cutoff criteria of Intelligibility in Context Scale-Traditional Chinese”,,Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50 (4), pp. 629–638
  • [14] Kim, JH., Ballard E & McCann CM, (2016,), “Parent-rated measures of bilingual children’s speech accuracy: Implications for a universal speech screen”.,International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(2), 202–211.
  • [15] Lee Y, (2019,), “Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for Korean-speaking preschool children”.,International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(4), 395–403.
  • [16] Lee Y, (2018,), “Exploring the utility of speech intelligibility rated by parents for screening children with speech sound disorders”,Communication Sciences and Disorders, 23(1), 198-207
  • [17] Van Doornik AD, Gerrits E, McLeod S & Terband H, (2018,), “Impact of communication partner familiarity and speech accuracy on parents’ ratings of their child for the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Dutch”,,International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20 pp. 350-360
  • [18] Sprunt B, McPake B & Marella M, (2019,), “The UNICEF/Washington Group Child Functioning Module: Accuracy, inter-rater reliability and cut-off level for disability disaggregation of Fiji’s education management information system”.,International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5), 806
  • [19] Sprunt B & Marella M, (2018), “Measurement accuracy: Enabling human rights for Fijian students with speech difficulties”.,International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 89-97
  • [20] Hopf SC, McLeod S, McDonagh SH, (2017,), “Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for school students in Fiji”,,Clin Linguist Phon, 31 (7-9), pp. 487-502.
  • [21] Ridgell L, Roth CT, Bow M, Hares-Helou R, Arias KM, Pollard SH, Hamdan U, Tollefson TT & Skirko, JR, (2020), “Ecuadorian Spanish translation and validation of the VELO quality of life instrument. International Journal of Pediatric”,Otorhinolaryngology, 138, 110312
  • [22] Neumann, S., Schäuble, L., & McLeod, S., (2020), Skala zur Verständlichkeit im Kontext (ICS-G) - Erstes deutsches ICF-CY-basiertes Assessment zur Verständlichkeit von Kindern mit Aussprachestörungen,[The German Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-G) - First ICFCY based assessment of intelligibility in children with speech-sound disorder in Germany]. Forum Logopadie, 34(4), 24-28. https://www.dbl-ev.de/service/zeitschrift-forumlogopaedie/aktuelle-ausgabe/
  • [23] Neumann S, Rietz C, Stenneken P, (2017,), “The German Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-G): Reliability and validity evidence”,,International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52 (5), 585–594
  • [24] Nohová L, Ptáčková M, Šlesingrová E, Vitásková M, (2021,), Speech intelligibility in preschool children measured by Czech version of Intelligibility in Context Scale.,EDULEARN21 Proceedings. https://library.iated.org/view/NOHOVA2021SPE.
  • [25] Tomić D, & Mildner V, (2014,), “Validation of Croatian Intelligibility in Context Scale.”,,International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistic. https://www.bib.irb.hr/706048? rad=706
  • [26] Lousada M, Sa-Couto P, Sutre D, Figueiredo F, et al, (2019,), “Validity and reliability of the Intelligibility in Context Scale: European Portuguese version”,,Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33 (12), pp. 1125-1138.
  • [27] ] Blake HL, McLeod S & Verdon S, (2020,), “Intelligibility enhancement assessment and intervention: A single-case experimental design with two multilingual university students”.,Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 34(1-2), 1–20
  • [28] Crowe K, Marsc-hark M & McLeod S, (2019), “Measuring intelligibility in signed languages”.,Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 33(10–11), 991–1008.
  • [29] Seifert M, Wren Y, Davies A & McLeod S, (June). (2019), Parents’ ratings of intelligibility in 3-year-olds with cleft lip and/or palate using the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Findings f-rom the cleft collective Cohort studies.,Utrecht: European Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association (ECPCA).
  • [30] McCormack J, McLeod S, & Crowe K, (2019,), “What do children with speech sound disorders think about their talking?”,,Semin Speech Lang 2019, 40 pp. 94-104.
  • [31] McLeod S, Harrison LJ, McAllister L & McCormack J, (2013,), “Speech sound disorders in a community study of preschool children”.,American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(3), 503–522
  • [32] McLeod S, Baker E, McCormack J, Wren Y, Roulstone S, Crowe K, . . .& Howland C, (2017,), “Cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of computerassisted intervention delivered by educators for children with speech sound disorders”.,Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 1891-1910.
  • [33] McLeod S, Crowe K, Masso S, Baker E, McCormack J, Wren Y, Roulstone S & Howland C, (2017,), “Profile of Australian preschool children with speech sound disorders at risk for literacy difficulties”,,Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties,
  • [34] World Health Organization, (2007), ICF‐CY: International classification of functioning, disability and health: Children and youth version.,Geneva: Author.
  • [35] Bishop, DVM & McDonald, D, (2009,), “Identifying language impairment in children: Combining language test scores with parental report”,,International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44 (5), pp. 600-615.
  • [36] Mcleod S, & Baker E, (2014,), “Speech-language pathologists' practices regarding assessment, analysis, target se-lection, intervention, and service delivery for children with speech sound disorders”,,Clin Linguist Phon, 28 (7-8), pp. 508-531.
  • [37] Ng MYK, To, SKC, & McLeod S, (2014,), “Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale as a screening tool for preschoolers in Hong Kong”,,Clin Linguist Phon, 28 (5), pp. 316-328.
  • [38] Munn Z, Peters, MD Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, & Aromataris E, (2018,), “Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach”.,BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 1-7.
  • [39] McLeod S, (2020), “Intelligibility in Context Scale: Cross-linguistic use, validity, and reliability”.,Speech, Language and Hearing, 23(1), 9-16.
  • [40] McLeod S, (2015), “Intelligibility in Context Scale: A parent-report screening tool translated into 60 languages”.,Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 17(1), 7-12.
  • [41] McLeod S, Crowe K, & Shahaeian A, (2015), “Intelligibility in Context Scale: Normative and Validation Data for English-Speaking Preschoolers”,,Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 46 (3), pp. 266-276.
  • [42] McLeod S, Harrison, LJ, McCormack J, (2012,), “The intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure”,,J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55 (2), pp. 648-656.
  • [43] McLeod S, Harrison LJ, & McComack J, (2012,), “Intelligibility in Context Scale”,,http://wwwcsueduau/research/multilingual‐speech/ics.
  • [44] Bleile KM, (1995), Manual of articulation and phonological disorders.,SanDiego, CA: Singgular
  • [45] Robbins AM, & Osberger MJ, (1990,), Meaningful Use of Speech Scales.,http://medicine.iu.edu/oto/index.php/down-load_file/view/245/267/.
  • [46] Allen CM, Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, & O’Donoghue GM, (2001), Reliability of rating scales for measuring speech intellibility after pediatric cochlear implantation.,Otology and Neurotology, 22(5), 631-633.
  • [47] Weismer G, (2008,), “Speech Intelligibility”,,The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, pp.568-582
  • [48] Lagerberg TB, Johnels JA, Hartelius L, & Persson C, (2014,), “Assessment of intelligibility using children's spontaneous speech: Methodological aspects”,,International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(2), 228-239
  • [49] Johannisson T B, Lohmander A, & Persson C, (2014,), “Assessing Intelligibility by Single Words, Sentences and Spontaneous Speech: A Methodological Study of the Speech Production of 10-year-olds”,,Logoped Phoniatr Vocol journal, 39 (4), pp. 159-168.
  • [50] Miller N, (2013,), “Measuring up to speech intelligibility”,,International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 601-612.
  • [51] Lousada M, Jesus LMT, Hall A, Joffe V, (2014,), “Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention withchildren with phonologically based speech–sound disorders”,,International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders,1-18.
  • [52] McLeod S, & Baker E, (2017,), An evidence-based approach to assessment and intervention.,Pearson.